- Small Blue Planet - http://smallblueplanet.org -
Compare this “Cheap” Coal Option with the Idea of Passive Houses
Posted By mike On December 27, 2008 @ 12:57 pm In Connect the Dots, Small Foot Print, Global Warming | 1 Comment
This article in the NY Times covers growing interest in home use of coal stoves, but conveniently fails to review the complete cost of coal mining, the subsidies that the coal and other petro fuel industries get from our tax dollars, the long term cleanup costs of accidents like the [1] coal slurry spill this past week, the environmental devastation of [2] mountain top removal mining.
I think it is important that the complete context be considered when thinking about energy and comfort and how we live here. Simply looking at the cost of $165 per ton and the question about dealing with the coal ash is not the whole picture.
“Cheap” coal is not an elegant solution.
|
Article printed from Small Blue Planet: http://smallblueplanet.org
URL to article: http://smallblueplanet.org/2008/12/27/compare-this-cheap-coal-option-with-the-idea-of-passive-houses/
URLs in this post:
[1] coal slurry spill this past week: http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/12/25/tennessee-coal-ash.html
[2] mountain top remova: http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2006/02/16/reece/index.html
[3] Image: http://clipmarks.com/clip-to-blog/
[4] www.nytimes.com: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/27/business/27coal.html?th&emc=th
[5] heating oil: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/h/heating_oil/index
.html?inline=nyt-classifier
[6] Image: http://clipmarks.com/share/90672880-2A42-4502-83C3-A95E254EF1A9/blog/
Click here to print.